In a recent discussion, music critic Anthony Fantano raised a provocative question: Can Kendrick Lamar, often revered as hip-hop’s golden child, be subjected to criticism? While Fantano acknowledges Lamar as one of the best artists of the modern era, he expressed concerns about the rapper’s recent collaborations, particularly with Playboy Carti, given Lamar’s historically strong moral stances in his work.
In his commentary, Fantano pointed out that many fans react defensively when Lamar is critiqued, often quoting his lyrics that insist he is not a savior or a role model. Fantano argues that recognizing Lamar’s flaws does not equate to holding him to unrealistic standards of perfection. Instead, he suggests that a degree of consistency is expected from artists who espouse strong moral messages in their music. He believes that the duality of Lamar’s actions, particularly his choice to collaborate with artists who have faced serious allegations, raises questions about the authenticity of his message.
Fantano specifically criticized the seeming contradiction of Lamar’s moral posturing in light of his recent collaboration with Carti, who has been accused of domestic violence. He contends that it is inconsistent for Lamar to advocate for women’s rights while engaging with someone whose actions contradict those values. This inconsistency, Fantano argues, points to a troubling double standard that Kendrick applies selectively to others in the industry.
Moreover, Fantano addressed the recent feud between Lamar and Drake, suggesting that the moral high ground Kendrick claims in his criticism of Drake does not hold weight when viewed through the lens of his own collaborations. Fantano emphasizes that if the only bar Kendrick is clearing is to seem better than “the worst” in the industry, it reflects a concerning lack of accountability.
While acknowledging that Kendrick Lamar’s music and artistry are undeniably impactful, Fantano believes it is essential for fans and critics alike to engage in meaningful dialogue about the artist’s decisions. He argues that the expectation for artists to align their actions with their messages is not about demanding perfection but rather about seeking authenticity and integrity.
Fantano concludes that Kendrick Lamar, despite his immense talent, should not be treated as an infallible figure. Instead, he invites fans to critically assess the inconsistencies in Lamar’s narrative, urging a deeper understanding of the complexities of morality within the music industry. As discussions around accountability in hip-hop continue to evolve, Fantano’s critique serves as a call to action for both artists and their audiences to foster a culture of honesty and responsibility.