In a recent interview, Wack 100, a prominent figure in the hip-hop community, clarified misconceptions surrounding rapper Brick Baby and the ongoing RICO case involving the New Jersey Rolling 60s. Wack admitted that he was wrong to suggest that Brick Baby was an informant in the case, revealing instead that Brick Baby was actually a victim of extortion by Big U, another key player in the narrative.

The conversation began when Wack was asked about the discrepancies in charges against Brick Baby and another affiliate, Loose Cannon, who faces charges in the RICO case. Wack explained that while both Brick Baby and Loose Cannon were involved in criminal activities, the reason Brick Baby was not included in the RICO indictment was due to his status as a victim rather than a participant. He elaborated that Brick Baby had been extorted by Big U, which ultimately influenced the dynamics of the investigation.

Wack described a troubling scenario where Brick Baby was allegedly pressured during an interrogation, having been made aware of conversations that pointed to his involvement in a robbery. However, Wack emphasized that the initial information regarding Brick Baby’s activities came not from law enforcement investigations but from wiretaps connected to Big U. This revelation adds a layer of complexity to the case, suggesting that Brick Baby was caught in a web of manipulation rather than being a willing participant in criminal activities.

Moreover, Wack highlighted that Brick Baby had been aware of the looming RICO charges as early as June 2023, warning others in his circle about the impending investigation, which he referred to as “Big U Rico.” This forewarning indicates that Brick Baby had an understanding of the potential legal repercussions long before they materialized.

As the discussion progressed, Wack delved into the nature of gang affiliations and the implications of being involved in criminal enterprises. He raised questions about how mere participation in a single incident does not necessarily equate to being part of an organized criminal group. He argued that the lack of direct communication or involvement from Loose Cannon in the wiretaps raises doubts about his culpability in the broader conspiracy.

Wack’s comments shed light on the complexities of gang dynamics and legal implications, particularly in cases involving multiple players and varying degrees of involvement. He mentioned that the evidence against Loose Cannon appears to be flimsy, with little indicating his active participation in ongoing criminal endeavors.

The conversation took a turn when Wack reflected on Brick Baby’s reputation within the Los Angeles community after the death of rapper Nipsey Hussle. He noted that Brick Baby faced social ostracism due to his perceived association with known figures in the hip-hop scene, a situation complicated by his unwillingness to denounce certain affiliations.

Overall, Wack 100’s revelations about Brick Baby’s situation illustrate the intricate relationships and pressures within the gang culture that extend beyond mere criminal charges. As the RICO case unfolds, it remains to be seen how these dynamics will impact the individuals involved and the broader narrative of gang-related activities in the hip-hop world.