In a shocking revelation, President Joe Biden has admitted to The New York Times that he orally approved all pardons and commutations issued at the end of his term, a claim that raises serious questions about the authenticity of the clemency process. Instead of personally signing the official warrants, Biden stated that an autopen was used due to the sheer volume of cases, a move that critics are now scrutinizing as potentially undermining the integrity of his decisions.

This unexpected disclosure has ignited a firestorm of controversy, with political analysts and lawmakers expressing skepticism over Biden’s assertion that he made individual decisions on every case. Critics are demanding clarity, noting the logistical improbability of thoroughly reviewing numerous cases in a limited timeframe. As Congress gears up for hearings, aides and staffers are set to testify, potentially revealing more about the decision-making process behind these controversial pardons.

The implications of Biden’s statements are profound, as they not only cast doubt on the legitimacy of the pardons but also raise concerns about the president’s cognitive capabilities. Observers have noted the brevity of Biden’s recent interviews, including a tightly controlled ten-minute session with The New York Times, suggesting a deliberate effort to manage his public appearances amid ongoing scrutiny.

As investigations loom on Capitol Hill, the urgency of this situation cannot be overstated. Biden’s remarks may serve as a preemptive strategy to shield his aides from accountability, as they prepare to face questioning regarding the clemency process. With the political stakes higher than ever, this unfolding drama promises to captivate the nation as it develops. Stay tuned for updates as more information emerges from Congress and the White House.