In a shocking revelation, former President Donald Trump reportedly urged Ukrainian President Volodymyr Zelenskyy to consider striking deep into Russian territory, including Moscow and St. Petersburg, contingent on receiving U.S. long-range weapons. This explosive conversation, detailed in a Financial Times report, raises the stakes in an already volatile conflict as Trump pushes for a hardline stance against Russia.

During a recent Oval Office meeting, Trump announced a significant arms package to Ukraine, emphasizing the need for NATO allies to bolster Ukraine’s military capabilities. He issued a stark ultimatum to Russia, granting them a 50-day window to negotiate a ceasefire or face severe economic repercussions, including 100% tariffs on Moscow’s trading partners. The clock is ticking, and tensions are palpable.

As Trump’s rhetoric intensifies, he downplayed the potential for sending long-range missiles, raising questions about the U.S.’s strategic intentions. However, the conversation with Zelenskyy suggests a shift towards a more aggressive posture, with Trump reportedly asking, “Can you hit Moscow?” and receiving an affirmative response from Zelenskyy.

This unprecedented dialogue comes as Russia continues its relentless missile strikes on Ukraine, demonstrating a willingness to escalate its military aggression. The Kremlin has condemned the U.S. plans, claiming they contradict calls for peace, while simultaneously maintaining silence on the specifics of their response to Trump’s ultimatum.

With the world watching closely, the implications of this exchange could redefine the conflict’s trajectory. As Trump’s administration navigates this precarious situation, the fate of Ukraine—and the broader geopolitical landscape—hangs in the balance. The urgency of the moment cannot be overstated; as the deadline looms, the question remains: will diplomacy prevail or will the conflict escalate into an even more dangerous phase?